By Jay Greene
With Web services clearly the next wave in computing, Gates & Co. have little choice but to go along. And don't count them out
Almost no marketing buildup preceded Microsoft's
announcement of a major new Internet initiative in San Francisco on
Nov. 1. Some of the company's PR people even played down the event in
advance. Yet when Chairman Bill Gates took the podium in a ballroom at
the Palace Hotel, it soon became clear that this was arguably
Microsoft's most important Net strategy announcement since it launched
the so-called browser war against Internet pioneer Netscape a decade
earlier
In San Francisco, Gates proclaimed this the era of "Live" software and insisted that Microsoft (MSFT)
will play a major role in birthing a new generation of computing. He
laid out plans to create two families of Web services, one for
consumers, called Windows Live, and one for small businesses, called
Office Live. Both are online counterparts to its Windows and Office
software franchises, respectively.
Microsoft also plans to make
it easy for customers or independent software developers to build their
own Web services that interact with Redmond's technology. Unlike
traditional programs, such as Microsoft's Office productivity suite,
which reside on a PC, Web services run on Web sites and can be accessed
via any browser. "The Live era is just starting," Gates says. "It's a
new way to look at software and a better way to create opportunities."
STRUCK A NERVE.
While Gates sounded like a pioneer, Microsoft has been late coming to
terms with the newest phase of Internet technologies, commonly called
Web 2.0. The trailblazers are Internet search giant Google (GOOG), Web portal Yahoo! (YHOO), business services provider Salesforce.com (CRM),
and a host of startups. Web surfers can write documents at Writely.com,
create spreadsheets at Numsum.com, and manage photo albums at
Flickr.com.
Not long ago, computer users had to buy software to
handle those tasks. These outfits offer fun, easy-to-use services that
are inexpensive or free, often supported by advertising. Their customer
bases may be minuscule compared with Microsoft's, but their business
models struck a nerve. "I would hope this changes the business model
[at Microsoft] radically, because that's the way the business is
going," says analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs.
The
software giant's competitors made light of its pronouncements. "They're
under substantial attack by companies like Google, Yahoo, and
Salesforce.com, and they have to recreate themselves -- they have no
choice," says Salesforce.com Chief Executive Marc Benioff. But Benioff
says even with a new Web strategy, Microsoft isn't yet capable of
creating and introducing services as rapidly as its more nimble
adversaries.
"USERS GET TO CHOOSE."
Still, Microsoft's San Francisco event was eerily similar to its famous
Internet strategy day of December 7, 1995. Even Gates made a passing
reference to the earlier occasion, calling it "a big event, equivalent
to this one." Back then, Netscape and its popular Web browser made
Microsoft's Windows less relevant. Starting that day, Microsoft used
its wealth, Windows monopoly, and influence with PC makers to overtake
Netscape and turn the browser into little more than an extension of
Windows. That strategy, in part, also resulted in a federal antitrust
case that Microsoft settled in 2000.
Now, though, there's no
hint that Microsoft will run afoul of the law. Its new services are
based on widely accepted industry standards, rather than its own
proprietary technologies. "I don't see them leveraging their monopolies
this time," says analyst Charlene Li of tech market researcher
Forrester Research. "This is about them having to convince users that
their services are something they want. It's an acknowledgement that
the users get to choose."
Possibly most appealing is Windows
Live. Microsoft has created a Web site, Live.com, where people can
create personalized Web pages and gather many of the things they enjoy
doing on the Web. In addition to headlines about their favorite sports
teams and local weather, surfers can get e-mail, use instant messenger,
and check out feeds from blogs and audio podcasts.
"AN AMAZING JOB."
And it lets users post content from their own PCs, such as documents
they've recently read, giving Live.com features that don't exist at
popular services, such as My Yahoo. Most of Microsoft's offerings will
be free, though some will require paid subscriptions.
Office
Live offers a similarly wide array of services -- this time for small
businesses. Microsoft will give away Web sites, software for designing
them, and Web-based applications to manage businesses, such as
collaboration programs. It hopes to pay for that basic level of service
with ad sales. Users can subscribe to additional applications, such as
project management or time and billing management for a fee. And the
services link to Office programs such as Outlook so that users can work
both online and off.
Microsoft's revenues from the new
businesses will be largely ad-supported. "Google has done an amazing
job of getting that ad engine to click on all eight cylinders," says
Microsoft Chief Technology Officer Ray Ozzie, who helped out with the
announcements. "We've all learned a lot from them."
WHICH RISK IS WORSE?
The strategy is as risky as it is bold. Microsoft's new online
offerings will inevitably pull Web surfers -- and advertising dollars
-- away from its long-established MSN Internet portal. While Microsoft
isn't yet offering an online word-processing application, Ozzie says
it's looking at the possibility. That could ultimately draw business
away from its traditional Office products.
And most worrisome
for Gates & Co.: The creation of a new Web-based ecosystem for
software developers threatens to undermine the one it has long nurtured
for its Windows operating system. "We're going to have to take some
risks," Ozzie says.
Indeed, the risk of not doing anything is
potentially much worse. Microsoft has had to maintain its Windows and
Office empires, building ever more features into them to keep existing
customers coming back for more. At the same time, new businesses
emerged on the Web, threatening the relevance of those monopolies. As
companies such as Google and Salesforce.com grew, Microsoft had to
respond. Still, the new generation of Web services is designed to
augment its traditional products, not supplant them.
FAMILIAR PATTERN.
Microsoft's San Francisco event was high on vision and low on
specifics. That may have been why the PR people set out to lower
expectations. Much in the first batch of offerings are rebranded
products from its MSN business, with some clever updates. Windows Live
Messenger, for example, is the current MSN Messenger instant messenger
service with some new features, including one that lets users share
photo albums. Microsoft Office Live Essentials offers free Web design
for small businesses that has the company's FrontPage software at its
core.
But Microsoft is famous for starting late and winning in
the end. Now, with a new Internet era dawning, it's trying do so once
again.
Source www.businessweek.com